Most of what weโre going to talk about in terms of topology will only require the metric itself, and it wonโt be necessary to fall back on computing norms.
The three properties stated in Definitionย 3.2.6 are just Propositionย 3.2.5, turned into a definition. The more interesting fact about Definitionย 3.2.6 is that there is no additional structure imposed on the underlying set \(S\text{.}\)
Let \((V,\lVert\cdot\rVert)\) be a normed space, and let \(S\subseteq V\) be any subset. Then \(\left(S,d_{\lVert \cdot\rVert}\right)\) is metric space.
Itโs going to turn out that the shapes of sets are important to understanding functions. (The word topology means, roughly, the mathematical study of shapes -- which is why it appears as the title of this chapter.)
There arenโt all that many interestingly-shaped sets in \(\mathbb{R}\text{.}\) The most basic kind of subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\) are the intervals, which come in two flavors: open and closed.
Observe that each interval has a midpoint and a length; although we normally describe an interval like
\begin{equation*}
(3,16)
\end{equation*}
as "the open interval from 3 to 17", we could as well specify it as "the open interval whose midpoint is 10 and whose length is 14", or perhaps as "the open interval centered at 10 with radius 7".
In a normed space (or a metric space), we donโt have any notion of order, so intervals donโt make sense. But we can certainly talk about distances and centers. So weโre going to generalize the idea of an interval like this:
Convince yourself that if we think of \(\mathbb{R}\) as a normed space with \(\lvert\cdot\rvert\text{,}\) then the open balls in \(\mathbb{R}\) are precisely the open intervals, and the closed balls are precisely the closed intervals.